Today, using machine learning and natural language processing much progress has been made when it comes to AI being able imitate human interaction; see e.g. this NSFW AI But there are a few reasons it might not be able to take the place of human interaction altogether. One, the sheer emotional dimensions that we navigate with other humans are exceedingly difficult to reproduce. The specifics of empathy, humor and non-verbal communication - particularly irony in translation (see above) remain realms where an AI has failed to excel.
According to the data, 75% of us still want human contact when it comes personal conversations -and surveys indicate this trend holds across age demographics. This highlights that real, human connections are formed through trust and common experiences with people we can see in the flesh. In addition, human interaction is essential for mental health; offering emotional support and companionship that AI would never be able to fully replicate.
The fact that this is industry terminology at all shows how different AI driven responses are from human dialogue. This has a direct relationship with many poorly understood but absolutely critical concepts; such as context awareness and emotional intelligence, both of which limit how well AI can perform. AI of this magnitude can only simulate responses in response to pre-programmed scenarios and cannot adapt or be intuitive like a human at the moment.
As the past has shown, this is not what we can expect. The defeat of chess champion Garry Kasparov at the hands of IBM Deep Blue in 1997 demonstrated AI strategically. This win, however, did not signify AIs began dislodging humans from their more subtle and compassionate roles. Similarly, whilst customer service chatbots have sped up certain activities at this point human agents are yet to be replaced completely because of the fact they can deal with other more complex, as well highly emotional situations.
Using the words of tech magnate Elon Musk,"The ai is not going to replace humans, it's going to simply improve us. This quote epitomizes what AI is intended to, be augmenting human abilities rather than displace humans completely. In tasks where efficiency and accuracy are important, AI can help, but it will not perform well when emotional or ethical judgment is required.
For example, AI continues to struggle in the field of therapy and counseling. The advancements in technology and apps like Woebot which provides therapy for AI is undoubtedly a convenient aid, but they do not replace the support of a professional human therapist who can understand you on your level. These are not replacement tools but supplementary ones.
So overall, while the prospects of this NSFW AI look pretty cool ish and all that good stuff, it misses an essential touch to really replace actual humans in a scenario. The bias towards human touch, the emotional intricacies and real-time decision making unequivocally proves how un-substitutable HMIs are. For more updates on NSFW AI visit nsfw ai.